food for thought (and discussion)
michalsc at email.uc.edu
Wed Apr 2 11:50:25 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 2:25 am, Auke Kok wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> I'm kinda in doubt what to do with earthbase... To be honest I really
> don't see any use in maintaining another set of packages and I hate to
> see Dem waste his time on it. Though I appreaciate any effort made, I
> think we should realize:
> moonbase has been and is intended to be "stable"
> If we collectively want to step off this scheme and support two
> moonbases, I think a lot more needs to be done then support it in code.
> Besides that I think that lunar cannot support two moonbases right now
> as it is, we need more developers for that.
> If any of you has some strategic thoughts about this, please discuss
> them for me, I will happily change my thoughts if convinced ;^)
i disagree that the earthbase is a bad idea, if it is kept as a stable tree
of the moonbase and say updated monthly, or big stable packages
we gould get the people willing to use it to test it for us.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Lunar-dev