Jannis: Thanks for the partial answer.<br>
I dont really like how you answer, and you are not forced to answer.<br>I dont think that going into verbal agression ("ignorant") is a good way to answer.<br><br>I was looking for more details about xfwm4 and metacity, you just say that xfwm4 is more configurable. Well, finally you give 1 detail.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If you really wanted to know what separates xfwm you could have just<br>
asked. Questioning the purpose of Xfce is senseless unless we as<br>
hobby developers do it.<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br>That was what i did.<br>But for some reason you get insulted by comparing metacity with xfwm. Not being the developer of any of both, i cant know about any differences.<br>
I was looking for details and information, best possible answered with some link to the xfce page. Which as i say didnt found any.<br>I didnt question the purpose of xfce, i question the goals, which are not answered anywhere. I want to know if the developers still want a lightweight desktop and are focused to that or just want an alternative to gnome. But i think that for the bad answer that i have got, there is some kind of bad felling against gnome. That is sad, but dont blame me for that.<br>
<br>Forget all about it. And dont answer if you dont want to.<br><br></div></div>Cheers.<br>Diego<br><br>